6%) informative cases, and its LOI was observed in tumor tissues except only one (4.6%) LIT1 LOI observed in the adjacent normal tissues. IGF2 LOI was observed in 18 of the 40 (45%) informative cases, and all the cases showed LOI in the adjacent normal tissues. In five cases LOI were observed

in the normal tissues, but not in the cancer ones. Only one informative case showed LOI for both LOI LIT1 and IGF2. We observed only 3 LOI H19 of the 32 (8.6%) informative tumors cases, and two cases showed LOI in cancer tissues. In one case, LOI was observed in the normal tissue, but not in the cancerous tissue. Table 1 Summary of allele-specific expression in 89 gastric cancers Gene Informative(n) Imprint LOI Incidence of LOI in tumor LIT 22 10 12 12/22 (54.6%) IGF2 40 22 18 18/40 (45%) H19 35 32 3 3/32 (8.6%) Figure 1 Imprinting Tideglusib manufacturer analysis of LIT1 in gastric cancer. RsaI digestion of a 410 bp DNA PCR product (G1, G2) yielded bands of 222 and 188 bp indicating heterozygous specimens. RsaI digestion of RT-PCR amplification (Rn1, Rn2) showed only one allele expression in both normal tissues indicating maintenance of constitutional imprinting. Rt1, Rt2 displayed three bands in tumor specimens indicating loss of imprinting in contrast to their matching normal selleck chemical tissues (Rn1, Rn2). M, marker DL2000. Nc1, Nc2 represented

RT-PCR without reverse transcriptase. Figure 2 Imprinting analysis of IGF2 in gastric cancer. DNA (G1) and RT-PCR (G3) amplification using primers P1 and P3 and DNA amplification by PCR with primers P2 and P3 (G2) represented 1.4 kb, 1.12 kb and 292 bp respectively (see details in methods 6-phosphogluconolactonase section). G1, G2 and G3 are PCR products of the same normal tissue. ApaI- and SB202190 ic50 HinfI-digested normal tissue DNA PCR (Gn) from primers P2 and P3 displayed two bands of 256 and 231 bp indicating heterozygosity. The digested nested PCR product from primers P2 and P3 using the 1.12 kb RT-PCR product as a template showed monoallelic expression of IGF2 in normal (Rn1, Rn2) and biallelic expression in tumor (Rt1, Rt2) tissues.

Figure 3 Imprinting analysis of H19 in gastric cancer. H19 heterozygosity showed 655 bp DNA PCR product yielded bands of 487 and 168 bp by RsaI digestion (G1, G2). Normal tissues (N1, N2) showed only one allele expression indicating maintenance of normal imprinting (displayed 407 and 168 bp, 575 bp respectively by RsaI digestion RT-PCR products). T1, T2 displayed both three bands (575, 407 and 168 bp respectively) in tumor tissues indicating loss of imprinting in contrast to their matching normal tissues (N1, N2). M, marker DL2000. Nc1, Nc2 represented RT-PCR without reverse transcriptase. Demographic analysis The demographic characteristics of patients with or without LOI of LIT1, IGF2 and H19 were shown in Table 2. There were no differences in the mean age, sex ratio, diabetes mellitus(DM), cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and family history of GC between the LIT1, IGF2 and H19 LOI(+) versus (-) respectively.