A correction factor (0.91) was applied to the 3200 cpm (Puyau et al., 2002) threshold to yield a MVPA cutpoint of 2912 cpm (Corder et al., 2007). To limit participant burden, only maternal parenting style was assessed using the 30-item Children’s Report of Parent Behavior Inventory (CPRBI-30) (Schludermann and Schluderman, 1988). Mothers were classified as authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, or uninvolved/neglectful based on acceptance (α = 0.88) and control (α = 0.67) scores. As only 3.8% of mothers were classified as uninvolved, these participants were removed from analyses. Maternal and paternal logistic support (e.g., enrolling children in activities,

providing transportation to parks and playgrounds) Apoptosis Compound Library for physical activity and physical activity modeling were assessed using the child-completed Activity Support Scale (α > 0.7) ( Davison et al., 2003). Participants also completed four recently validated scales: (1) General Parenting Support (i.e., children’s

KPT-330 manufacturer perception of support; α, 0.8; ICC, 0.8); (2) Active Parents (children’s perceptions of their parents’ activity on both weekdays and weekend days; α, 0.7; ICC, 0.6); (3) Past Parental Activity (i.e., children’s perception of their parents’ prior physical activity level, α, 0.7; ICC, 0.6); and (4) Guiding support (i.e., parental rules for physical activity, α, 0.7; ICC, 0.7) ( Jago et al., 2009). Height and weight were measured, and a body mass index

(kg/m2) standard deviation score (BMI SDS) was calculated (Cole et al., 1995). Highest education within the household was obtained by parental Dipeptidyl peptidase report. To account for the season of assessment, the hours of daylight on the first day of data collection was calculated. Analysis of variance tests with follow-up Scheffé tests were used to examine if physical activity or parenting practices differed by parenting style. Linear regression models were used to examine if parenting styles and parenting practices predicted physical activity. The model included parenting style and any parenting practice variable that was correlated (p < 0.05) with physical activity (data not reported). All models were adjusted for the highest level of education in the household, BMI SDS, and hours of daylight. Models were run separately for boys and girls. Robust standard errors were used to account for the clustering of participants within schools. All analyses were performed in Stata version 10.1 (College Station, Texas). Alpha was set at 0.05. Compared to girls, boys engaged in more minutes of MVPA per day (41.3 vs. 29.2, p < 0.001) and had a higher CPM (599.2 vs. 502.9, p < 0.001). Boys also reported higher maternal and paternal logistic support and modeling ( Table 1).