Bizarre structures are common in many fishes, as well as other reptiles. In birds, sexual dimorphism, display and selection are well-established phenomena that have clearly had a very strong role in shaping avian evolution. The expression of bizarre structures
in mammals, notably ungulates, is entailed in a constellation of ecological characteristics that greatly complicate their explanation (Jarman, 1974; Perez-Barberia, Lorlatinib Gordon & Pagel, 2002). Finally, we emphasize that a given structure may have several purposes, and that even in living animals it is often difficult to determine the uses of particular structures, their evolutionary histories, and even how the animals are communicating. In this respect the hypotheses of paleobiologists are largely interpreting the shadows on the wall of Plato’s cave. We persist in efforts to explain these structures because they were of obvious use to their bearers, and this is in principle discoverable. We thank S. Bar-David, J. Brashares, V. de Buffrenil, K. Carpenter, P. Cross, P. check details Dodson, J.O. Farlow, E. Hebets, T. Hieronymus, R. Irmis, C. Janis, E. Lacey, B. Lundrigan, S. Patek, A. de Ricqlès, M.J. Ryan, S.M. Sampson, K.M. Scott, A.B. Shabel, L.M. Witmer and many other colleagues and
reviewers for constructive comments and suggestions, without implying their agreement with all our points. UCB undergraduates Jasmeet K. Dhaliwal and Sylvia Moses provided research support. R. Irmis and A. Lee provided technical support. This work was supported by the University of California Museum of Paleontology and the Committee on Research of the University of California, Berkeley. This is UCMP Contribution No. 2012. “
“Wild ruminants may differ in their protozoal fauna according to their
feeding type, 上海皓元医药股份有限公司 but a comprehensive evaluation of available data is lacking. Here, we evaluate the literature data available on the protozoal fauna (diversity, concentration and proportions of the major groups including Entodiniinae, Diplodiniinae and Isotrichidae) in relation to the natural diet (as percentage of grass in the natural diet, %grass) and body mass (BM) in 55 wild ruminant species. The effects of ruminant phylogeny were controlled for using phylogenies based on molecular data and phylogenetic generalized least-squares. Transferring results from domestic to wild ruminants, we hypothesized (1) a decrease in the proportion of Entodiniinae and an increase in that of Diplodiinae, with %grass in the natural diet; (2) a positive correlation between Diplodiinae and Isotrichidae; (3) no influence of BM on these protozoal groups. Based on the literature statements, we additionally expected that (4) protozoa diversity increased with %grass and BM and that (5) protozoa concentrations were independent of both BM but decreased with %grass. Only hypothesis 1 was confirmed completely. Isotrichidae and Diplodiinae only tended to correlate (P=0.08), but the proportion of Isotrichidae increased with BM.