One key idea implicit in both algorithmic frameworks is the idea

One key idea implicit in both algorithmic frameworks is the idea of abstraction layers—each level of the hierarchy need only be concerned with the “language” of its input area and its local job. For example, in the serial chain framework, while workers in the middle of a car assembly line might put in the car engine, they do not need to know the job description of early line

workers (e.g., how to build a chassis). In this analogy, the middle line workers are abstracted away from the job description of the early line workers. Most complex, human-engineered systems have PD-0332991 order evolved to take advantage of abstraction layers, including the factory assembly line to produce cars and the reporting organization of large companies to produce coordinated action. Thus, the possibility that each cortical area can abstract away the details below its input area may be critical for

leveraging a stack of visual areas (the ventral stream) to produce an untangled object identity representation (IT). A key advantage of such abstraction is that the “job description” of each worker is locally specified and maintained. The trade-off is that, in its strongest instantiation, no one oversees the online operation of the entire processing chain and there are many workers at each level operating in parallel without explicit coordination (e.g., distant parts of V1). Thus, the proper selleck products upfront job description at each local cortical subpopulation must be highly robust to that lack of across-area and within-area supervision. In principle, such robustness could arise from either an ultraprecise, stable set of instructions given to each worker upfront (i.e., precise genetic control of all local cortical synaptic weights within the subpopulation), or from a less precise “meta” job description—initial instructions that are augmented by learning that continually

refines the daily job description of each worker. Such learning mechanisms could involve feedback (e.g., Hinton et al., 1995; MTMR9 see above) and could act to refine the transfer function of each local subpopulation. We argue above that the global function of the ventral stream might be best thought of as a collection of local input-output subpopulations (where each subpopulation is a “worker”) that are arranged laterally (to tile the visual field in each cortical area) and cascaded vertically (i.e., like an assembly line) with little or no need for coordination of those subpopulations at the time scale of online vision. We and others advocate the additional possibility that each ventral stream subpopulation has an identical meta job description (see also Douglas and Martin, 1991, Fukushima, 1980, Kouh and Poggio, 2008 and Heeger et al., 1996). We say “meta” because we speculate about the implicit goal of each cortical subpopulation, rather than its detailed transfer function (see below).

Comments are closed.