The renal subcapsular hematoma which is located in the renal hilu

The renal subcapsular hematoma which is located in the renal hilum and renal collection area needs to be differentiated from parapelvic cyst and urine containing extravasation cyst caused by renal pelvis injury. The hematoma and urine have different MR signal characteristics, the contrast agent can be found getting into the urine containing cyst from the renal pelvis tear location in retrograde urography and CT enhanced delay scanning, they can be respectively identified. For avoiding the imaging misdiagnosis of the liquid

space-occupying lesion which is located in the renal collecting area, the correct ideal quality imaging examination and all the subtle signs should be paid enough attention. The authors declare that no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. “
“First described in 1740 by Morgani,1 the appearance of ectopic adrenocortical tissue (EACT) in the spermatic cord has occasionally been Paclitaxel reported in children

and adolescents. Sullivan et al2 assessed the incidence of EACT in the groin of children and examined the relationship between the appearance and underlying diagnosis, age, and sex. Of 935 groin explorations, EACT was identified in only 25 children (2.7%). There were no cases in girls, and the occurrence declined with increasing age. Published case reports of EACT in adults are extremely rare.3 and 4 Our 44-year-old patient had the typical signs and symptoms of symptomatic varicocele. Inguinal microsurgical repair selleck chemicals according to Ivanisevic was agreed with him. After inguinal exposure of the spermatic cord, we found a bright yellowish soft nodule (9 × 5 × 4 mm), CYTH4 clearly different in color and consistency from the surrounding tissue. It was completely resected because a definitive assessment

of the tumor could not be made intraoperatively. Histologic examination revealed EACT (Figure 1 and Figure 2). No further examinations or follow-ups were necessary, because the patient had normal adrenal function and was asymptomatic. Embryologically, adrenal cortex arises from the mesoderm, whereas adrenal medulla develops from ectoderm of the neural crest. During the fourth and fifth week of gestation, primitive cortex originates from mesothelial cells between the mesentery root and the developing gonads, which are proliferating and separating in the mesenchyme of the dorsal abdominal wall. Subsequently, neighboring cells are added to form the definitive cortex, and medulla is formed by invasion of cells from the neural crest. It can be assumed that adrenal residues develop because of mechanical separation and that dislocation can occur as a result of the descent of the sex glands in male embryonic development.5 It is assumed that EACT (also called the Marchand rest or Marchand adrenals) may be common in newborns, but is very rare in adults, because the tissue becomes atrophic during adolescence and adult life.

Pharmacologic interventions reviewed include NSAIDs, corticostero

Pharmacologic interventions reviewed include NSAIDs, corticosteroid injections, and glucosamine. This guideline updates the previous American College of Rheumatology Guidelines for Hip and Knee OA from 2000. Several additional documents that provide the detailed information of the studies that contribute to the recommendations ROCK inhibitor are available from the Arthritis Care

and Research website as detailed in the additional materials above. “
“Latest update: 2011. Next update: Within 3 years. Patient group: Adults with a chief complaint of pain in a radicular pattern in one or both upper extremities related to compression and/or irritation of one or more cervical nerve roots. Intended audience: Health care professionals LY2109761 clinical trial treating patients with cervical radiculopathy. Additional versions: A summary version of the document is contained within the reference: Bono CM et al (2011) An evidencebased clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders. The Spine Journal 11: 64–72. Expert working group: The guidelines indicate that a multidisciplinary

group developed the guidelines, but details of members are not provided. The related publication is authored by 18 medical practitioners from the USA. Funded by: Not indicated. Consultation with: Consultation with committees and the board of The North American Spine Society. Approved by: The North American Spine Society. Location: http://www.spine.org/Pages/PracticePolicy/ClinicalCare/ClinicalGuidlines/Default.aspx Description: The full guideline is a 180-page document that provides evidence-based recommendations on key clinical questions concerning the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative

disorders. These include: the definition of cervical radiculopathy, its natural history, history and physical examination findings to support this diagnosis, diagnostic tests including imaging and electrodiagnostics, outcome measures and evidence for intervention. The interventions reviewed include pharmacology, steroid injections, exercise, physical therapy, manipulation, chiropractics, bracing, traction, and electrical Parvulin stimulation. Various surgical techniques and devices are also reviewed for their evidence of efficacy. Finally, long term results of various treatments are discussed. The journal publication provides a summary of the recommendations, whereas the full guideline provides more detail such as summaries of all papers contributing to the evidence. “
“Assessing recovery with outcome measures is a process in which standardised procedures are used to evaluate an often complex clinical picture (Wilkin et al 2003). It’s difficult to believe that up until 35 years ago, clinicians did not have validated, self-reported outcome measures to use in clinical practice (Ware et al 1975).

However, the criterion eliminated emerging manufacturers that wer

However, the criterion eliminated emerging manufacturers that were keen to establish local influenza vaccine production but had not (yet) registered a vaccine for human use. In order to address the urgent need for regions such as sub-Saharan Africa to be able to produce pandemic influenza vaccine, future calls may see modified criteria to take this into account. Pfizer Licensed Compound Library To complement its review of production technologies, WHO undertook an analysis of intellectual property (IP) issues related to each manufacturing

process to identify potential IP barriers and areas where new manufacturers would have to seek licences [5]. The report noted that it was not patents, but access to technical know-how and regulatory dossiers that potentially constituted significant barriers, even for conventional egg-derived influenza vaccines. Thus, partnerships with technology holders were sought to ensure the successful and rapid establishment of production capacity. Similarly, there are no significant patent barriers to produce live attenuated influenza vaccines, which have been widely used in Russia and

the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics for the last thirty years. Nonetheless, access to strains with a well documented safety and efficacy profile, and to corresponding regulatory documentation, would avoid the lengthy and expensive process of deriving a new LAIV through de novo attenuation of pathogenic virus strains. To facilitate access to such attenuated strains, WHO acquired from Nobilon (now Merck) Trichostatin A a licence on the technology developed by the Institute of Experimental Medicine in St Petersburg, Russia. This royalty-free licence to develop, manufacture and sell Linifanib (ABT-869) to the public sector both seasonal and pandemic egg-derived LAIV allowed WHO to provide sub-licences to manufacturers in developing countries (see article by Rudenko et al. [8]). The report also noted that no IP barriers existed in developing countries for an oil-in-water emulsion that permits considerable dose-reduction with IIV, since patents had not been filed in these areas of the world. This opened the

possibility for developing country vaccine manufacturers to produce and use adjuvants to expand IIV capacity in the event of a pandemic. Again, know-how was identified as a major hurdle. Effective technology transfer is arguably the most effective route for developing countries to secure sustainable access to quality influenza vaccine production technology. As pointed out above, technology transfer from an entity that has a registered product is the most effective, as this reduces risk to the recipient and facilitates rapid approval of the locally produced product. However, while most major vaccine manufacturers have undertaken technology transfer for early childhood vaccines, few have been willing to transfer their influenza vaccine technology.

Ltd , India) The blends were fed into a twin screw extruder (OMi

Ltd., India). The blends were fed into a twin screw extruder (OMicron 12, Steer Engineering Pvt. Ltd., India) and extruded under the following set of continuous Selleckchem Nutlin3a variables; Feed rate: 5 g/min, Screw speed: 200–220 rpm, Torque: 1.5–3 Nm and Residence time: about 60–90 s. Different processing temperature zones maintained in the hot melt extruder were as – Zone 1: 40 °C, Zone 2: 60 °C, Zone 3: 120 °C, Zone 4: 150 °C, Zone 5: 180 °C, Zone 6: 210 °C, Zone 7: 195 °C and chiller: < −10 °C for ACEU and Zone 1: 40 °C, Zone 2: 60 °C, Zone 3: 100 °C, Zone 4: 140 °C, Zone 5: 160 °C, Zone 6: 190 °C, Zone

7: 180 °C and chiller: < −10 °C for ACEL. Down-stream auxiliary equipments like chill rolls provided instantaneous solidification of the extruded strands and a vacuum pump for degassing/venting the extrudates. The extrudates were milled to be passed through 30 # ASTM sieve and subjected to initial evaluation. The proportion

of solid dispersions of ACT with EPO, optimised on the basis of maximum enhancement in solubility characteristics and least residual crystallinity of ACT was further coprocessed with a plasticiser, Poloxamer-237 Etoposide molecular weight in 0.15 and 0.30 proportions (by weight) to overcome problems related to ease of extrudability, residual crystallinity, thermal browning/degradation and again subjected to initial evaluation and accelerated stability study as stated below. ACT, both the proportions of solid dispersions of ACT with EPO (denoted as ACEU) and solid dispersions of ACT with EPO and POL (denoted as ACEL) were subjected to initial evaluation as follows: Morphological appearance: Samples were mounted ADP ribosylation factor on double- faced adhesive tape and sputtered with thin gold layer. Surface morphology was studied with a scanning electron microscope (Jeol 5400, Japan). Molecular interactions: FT-IR spectra were obtained using an FT-IR spectrometer (8400 S, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) over wavenumber range of 4000–500 cm−1. Thermal analysis: Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) thermograms were obtained using differential scanning calorimeter (Mettler

Toledo 821e, Mettler Toledo, Switzerland) operated with Stare software (version 9.01). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out using DTG-60H (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) instrument. 3–5 mg of samples were analysed in hermetically sealed, pin holed aluminium crucibles. The samples were heated at a constant rate at 10 °C/min over a temperature range of 30–300 °C. An inert atmosphere was maintained by purging nitrogen gas at flow rate of 40 ml/min. Crystallographic study: XRPD profiles were recorded on X-ray diffractometer (Bruker AXS-D8 Advance, Germany). The samples were irradiated with monochromatic Cu K radiation (1.542 Å) and analysed between 2 and 45°(2θ). The step size, voltage and current of 0.10, 40 kV and 40 mA were used, respectively. Drug content: 50 mg each of ACEU and ACEL was dissolved in 100 ml of methanol.

The NALT cells of all mice in each group were pooled Lungs were

The NALT cells of all mice in each group were pooled. Lungs were perfused with PBS, cut into small pieces and digested with 0.7 mg/ml collagenase LY2109761 molecular weight type I (Sigma, Poole, UK) and 30 μg/ml DNase I (Sigma) for 45 min at 37 °C. Lung fragments were then

crushed through a cell strainer using a 5 ml syringe plunger, washed, purified over a cushion of lympholyte (Cederlane, Ontario, Canada), washed again and resuspended in complete DMEM. Cells were cultured in complete DMEM and stimulated with the dominant CD4 (Ag85A99–118aa TFLTSELPGWLQANRHVKPT) and CD8 (Ag85A70–78aa MPVGGQSSF and Ag85A145–152aa YAGAMSGL) peptide epitopes at 2 μg/ml. Peptides were synthesized by Peptide Protein Research Ltd., Fareham, UK. After 1 h at 37 °C Golgi Plug (BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK) was added according to check details the manufacturer’s instructions

and cells were incubated for an additional 5 h before intracellular cytokine staining. For IL-17 staining Golgi Plug was added after 2 h. Cells were washed and incubated with CD16/CD32 mAB to block Fc binding then cells stained for CD4 (RM4-5), CD127 (A7R34), CD62L (MEL-14), IFNγ (XMG1.2), IL-2 (JES6-5H4), TNFα (MP6-XT22) and IL-17 (17B7) (eBioscience, Hatfield, UK) and CD8 (53-6.7) (BD Bioscience) using the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were run on a LSRII (BD Biosciences) and analysed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA). The proportions of cells producing different Rebamipide cytokines were calculated using Spice 5.0, kindly provided by Dr. M. Roederer, Vaccine Research Centre, NIAID, NIH, USA. All results are representative of at least two independent experiments with similar results. Data were analysed using Student’s t-test or non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis or Mann–Whitney tests as

indicated in the figure legends. The volume of an i.n. inoculum has been shown to determine the location of antibody responses in the respiratory tract, with smaller volumes eliciting URT responses and larger volumes eliciting responses both in the URT and the deep lung [18]. The particle size of the antigen or the nature of the aerosol methodology has also been shown to influence the localisation of antigen in the respiratory tract and the subsequent antibody response [19] and [20]. It was therefore important to show that Ad85A administered in small volumes elicited an URT immune response. We therefore immunised mice with the same number of Ad85A viral particles suspended in 5, 6, 10, 20 or 50 μl to determine which inocula induced responses in the NALT and lung. The response was measured as the number CD8+ T-cells producing IFN-γ in response to Ad85A peptides (Table 1).

However, we cannot draw firm conclusions here as isotype detectio

However, we cannot draw firm conclusions here as isotype detection in serum and nasal swabs must surely be improved. The currently used horseradish peroxidase labelled, cross-reactive

anti-chicken IgG, IgM and IgA conjugates were clearly not sensitive enough as total IgG (H + L) MOMP-specific antibodies were detected post-booster vaccination, while isotype ELISAs remained negative. In addition, following challenge, mean MOMP-specific IgM serum antibody titres remained higher than IgG titres, click here which is quite unusual and has not been observed before. The use of biotinylated monoclonal antibodies for turkey isotypes would certainly improve the sensitivity and specificity of the isotype ELISAs. Evidence for the mobilisation of T-cell memory in the vaccinated groups was shown by the significantly increased PBL proliferative

responses 25 days post-challenge when compared to the non-vaccinated control group. Best protection, as observed for the polyplex IM group, correlated with the highest stimulation index and the highest percentage of CD4+ T-cells. This is in accordance with studies conducted in mice and humans showing especially CD4+ T-helper type 1 (Th1) cells to be essential for protection against C. trachomatis or C. muridarum infections [35] and [36]. In future immunisation experiments, we should try to get more detailed insights into protective immunity by quantifying antibody producing B-lymphocytes by use of an ELISPOT assay, analogous to the one recently developed for studying C. trachomatis protective immunity in pigs Autophagy inhibitor (K. Schautteet, unpublished results). In addition, we should try to determine T-cell subsets and signature Th1 (IFN-γ), Th2 (IL-13) and T-reg (IL-10) cytokine expression following immunisation

and challenge. This cytokine expression could be examined using a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction as recently described by Mayne et al. [37] for footpath dermatitis in turkeys. In conclusion, the codon of the ompA gene was adapted and optimised to the codon usage in birds. Linear PEI polyplexes gave the highest transfection efficiencies in BGM cells, followed by brPEI polyplexes, whereas lipoplexes and polyplexes generated using PAMAM dendrimers Farnesyltransferase of generation 5 did not significantly enhance the transfection efficiency. The physical properties and transfection efficiencies of lPEI polyplexes were affected by nebulisation using a Cirrus™ nebulizer while brPEI polyplexes were not affected. These results allowed the selection of a codon-optimised polyplex vaccine (brPEI-pcDNA1/MOMPopt, N/P = 8) for subsequent aerosol vaccination studies in specific pathogen free turkeys. The use of brPEI-pcDNA1/MOMPopt increased the immunogenicity of the Cp. psittaci DNA vaccine.

’ By

’ By www.selleckchem.com/products/AP24534.html restricting the embryonic

researcher’s horizons to a limited definition of ‘best research evidence’ are we narrowing our focus too much and stifling the creativity of some of the outstanding physiotherapy researchers of the future? Further, are randomised trials actually the appropriate design for the question being asked? Prognostic studies, for example, are seldom best dealt with in this way. A dilemma for the consumer of research, whether clinician, teacher or researcher, who wishes to translate research findings into treatment directions, is that research evidence is situated somewhere on a continuum and although one end of that is represented by the conclusive and comprehensive synthesis of information from the highest level studies, there may be other levels of evidence that can provide assistance in formulating effective treatments (Hjørland BGB324 ic50 2011). We have perhaps rejected

the broader, more exploratory research models because the highest level of evidence is perceived to be the Holy Grail of clinical research, but in the absence of such evidence, what do we do? The prominence given to ‘high’ levels of evidence means that researchers may be coerced into carrying out clinical trials without the benefit of solid theoretical bases and a comprehensive understanding of operational mechanisms. If the experimental question is flawed, the trial will be irrelevant. Examples of alternative models for the development of best practice guidelines do exist. In the ‘Kaufman Best Practices Project’ approach, what we tend to define as evidence-based practice was not applied as the sole criterion, however but rather as part of a wider matrix, in which a treatment could achieve ‘best practice’ status only if it could

also demonstrate a sound theoretical base, general acceptance in clinical practice, a substantial body of supporting anecdotal or clinical literature, and absence of adverse effects or harm (Kaufman Foundation 2004). Are we in danger of creating an environment in which clinical and academic physiotherapists are unwilling to go anywhere unless there is a narrowly defined body of ‘evidence’ to support them? If so, our collective research output will become less ground-breaking and our professional practice more robotic. We should remember that much of what has become our best clinical practice originated through eclectic and far-reaching surveys of relevant science. The Motor Relearning Program (Carr and Shepherd 1987) began through a comprehensive collation of up-to-date information from neurophysiology, biomechanics, human ecology, behavioural science, and many other areas. This synthesis led, in turn, to the development of a provisional theoretical framework and the generation of testable hypotheses.

The questionnaire was pre-tested by 15 pediatricians and subseque

The questionnaire was pre-tested by 15 pediatricians and subsequently Forskolin solubility dmso posted to all eligible members, accompanied by a cover letter and one-page background information on Bexsero® and MenB IMD epidemiology in Germany. Returned questionnaires were

double-entered electronically using EpiData version 3.1 (EpiData Association, Denmark). A descriptive analysis was performed, including calculation of proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Demographic data on participants were compared to available BVKJ-member information. Due to Germany’s geographical size and historical differences, we performed regional analyses. We explored associations using the Chi-squared Test and univariate logistic regression, followed by stratification for duration in private practice, sex and region to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata® version 13 (StataCorp, Texas, USA). Of the 5677 questionnaires sent out, 3107 (55%) were returned. Respondents’

mean age was 53 years (all BVKJ-members: 54 years), 52% were male (all members: 50%), and response ranged from 53–58% per region. Mean duration in pediatric practice was 16 years, and 99% (n = 3070) were board-certified pediatricians. Participants’ responses are summarized in Table 1. The majority (79.1%) stated they would recommend MenB vaccination. The most common reasons given for not recommending the vaccine were a concern that the schedule would become overcrowded Autophagy Compound Library research buy and insufficient

data on potential rare adverse events. Children ≤24 months were most frequently specified as target groups for MenB vaccination, in keeping with the highest incidence at these ages. Two thirds of participants believed that parents would be acceptant Ketanserin of an official STIKO recommendation. Of two possible licensed vaccine schedules integrating MenB vaccination into the current German routine immunization schedule, vaccination at month 6, 8 and 12 of age (Option 2, Fig. 1) was preferred by 66.7% of physicians (95%CI 65.0–68.3; n = 2070), whereas vaccination at month 2, 3, 4 and 12 (Option 1, Fig. 1) was favored by only 13.4% (95%CI 12.2–14.6; n = 416). Neither schedule was chosen by 14% (95%CI 13.0–15.5; n = 441). Of these, 59.6% (95%CI 54.9–64.3%; n = 263) indicated they would vaccinate in the first 6 months of life but at different time points than in Option 1. In keeping with the strong preference for Option 2, only 31.3% of all respondents thought MenB vaccination should be administered concomitantly with other standard vaccinations. Similarly, >70% of all participants objected in principle to the simultaneous administration of 3 vaccines; 19.7% among those favoring Option 1 and 81.8% among those favoring Option 2 (p < 0.005). The most common reason given for objection was lack of parental acceptance ( Table 1).

Lorsque qu’il est nécessaire de répéter la CHE dans un délai infé

Lorsque qu’il est nécessaire de répéter la CHE dans un délai inférieur à 6 mois, l’opportunité de combiner la CHE à un traitement systémique sera envisagée. De même, lorsque le volume tumoral est important et sachant la morbidité-mortalité de ce geste significative, des sessions multiples sont alors recommandées et l’association à des approches systémiques constitue une alternative. La radiofréquence est actuellement utilisée dans le traitement des métastases Pexidartinib research buy de TNE bien différenciées de petit volume[78]. Elle peut être réalisée en percutanée ou constituer un complément des indications de la chirurgie

hépatique en permettant la destruction de métastases hépatiques d’accès chirurgical difficile en raison de leur situation ou de leur nombre. Les recommandations françaises et européennes positionnent la radiofréquence hépatique en deuxième ligne des options locorégionales lorsque la chirurgie n’est pas envisageable [3] and [27]. Dans le cas des insulinomes, ces approches peu morbides peuvent constituer une alternative intéressante à la chirurgie chez des patients à risque opératoire élevé, lorsque le volume tumoral est adapté à l’emploi de ces techniques. Quelques publications rapportent un bénéfice symptomatique dans les insulinomes malins [25] and [28]. La taille des métastases (idéalement < 3 cm) reste le principal facteur prédictif de

réponse à la radiofréquence. La mortalité est faible, inférieure à 1 %. Cette technique est aussi largement utilisée pour le traitement des nodules pulmonaires et plus récemment des métastases osseuses. Des techniques Urease alternatives comme les micro-ondes ou la cryothérapie check details sont aussi possibles. Elle est indiquée en cas de localisations osseuses douloureuses ou instables, cutanées et cérébrales[79]. Le bénéfice reste

mal étudié à ce jour dans les carcinomes bien différenciés : à court terme, les stabilisations constituent la réponse tumorale la plus fréquente. Sa place dans le contrôle des tumeurs primitives notamment pancréatiques au stade métastatique n’est pas définie. Le développement de la chirurgie stéréotaxique élargit les indications de la radiothérapie externe et la positionne donc comme une nouvelle option concurrente de l’ensemble des techniques locorégionales. Ils s’adressent surtout aux patients restant symptomatiques malgré l’emploi des traitements cités ci-dessus, ou à ceux classés d’emblée de mauvais pronostic en raison d’une progression tumorale de plus de 20 % sur un an ou moins selon les critères RECIST, d’un volume tumoral important (envahissement hépatique > 30 %, présence de métastases osseuses), d’une biologie tumorale agressive (grade 3 ou Ki67 > 10-20 % ou exceptionnelles formes histologiques peu différenciées) [18], [71] and [72]. Un traitement systémique sera discuté également à chaque fois que les options locorégionales doivent être répétées avec une fréquence élevée (< 6 mois).

For each of these parameters we examined two sets of values keepi

For each of these parameters we examined two sets of values keeping all other parameters fixed at the values given in Table 1. We then re-fitted our model to the HPA rotavirus surveillance data for England and Wales to re-estimate ω, b1, φ and q. We chose one set of parameter values less than and the other greater than the original parameter estimates. We compared the model fits to our original model by comparing RMSD values. Parameters estimated from our model are summarised in Table 2. The force of infection was highest in the 1–4 year olds and lowest in over 5 year olds. The seasonality, age distribution and numbers of reported rotavirus cases predicted Selleck INK-128 by the model were a good fit to the rotavirus

surveillance data (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). An increasing decline in numbers and delay in the start of the rotavirus season is predicted in the Trichostatin A nmr first and second post-vaccination years (Fig. 4). Interestingly, there is a slight rise in numbers and earlier start to the rotavirus season

predicted in the third season post-vaccination compared to the second (Fig. 4). Peak activity was observed in early March (week 10) during an average pre-vaccination season compared with peak activity in April (week 16) in the second post-vaccination year and March (week 13) in the third post-vaccination year. Long-term vaccination coverage rates for the rotavirus vaccine can be expected to be similar to that of the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, polio) vaccine, approximately 91% at year of first birthday in the United Kingdom [33]. This is because the rotavirus vaccine schedule is similar to that of the DTP vaccine. In the long-term, with 91% coverage levels for the full two-dose schedule, the model predicts a 72% reduction in the seasonal peak in incidence and a 61% reduction in the overall burden of disease compared to pre-vaccination years (Fig. 5). The seasonal pattern of rotavirus disease appears to stabilize approximately 10 years after introduction of the vaccine (Fig. 5). The average age of reported cases is expected

to increase from 1.4 years old pre-vaccination to 5.3 years old post-vaccination (Fig. 3). The model suggests the vaccine will provide both direct and indirect effects. At 91% vaccine coverage, almost an additional 3% reduction in reported cases is predicted compared to direct effects of vaccination alone (Fig. 6). Where immunization against a primary infection is achieved after 1 dose (2 months of age), 2 doses (4 months of age) or 3 doses (6 months of age), the model predicts a 59–69% reduction in reported cases at high vaccine coverage (Fig. 6). As vaccine coverage levels approach 100%, biennial patterns of rotavirus activity are predicted. The best-case scenario where immunization against a primary infection is achieved after 1 dose showed the largest decrease in rotavirus cases post-vaccination. Otherwise, post-vaccination epidemiology was similar for the above 3 scenarios.